Comparison of Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopic Fluorescein Angiography and Offset Pinhole Imaging

Authors

Toco Y.P. Chui, New York Eye and Ear InfirmaryFollow
Michael Dubow, New York Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alexander Pinhas, New York Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiFollow
Nishit Shah, New York Eye and Ear InfirmaryFollow
Alexander Gan, New York Eye & Ear InfirmaryFollow
Rishard Weitz, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
Yusufu N. Sulai, University of RochesterFollow
Alfredo Dubra, Marquette University
Richard B. Rosen, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

17 p.

Publication Date

3-2014

Publisher

Optical Society of America

Source Publication

Biomedical Optics Express

Source ISSN

2156-7085

Original Item ID

doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.001173; PubMed Central: PMCID 3985984

Abstract

Recent advances to the adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) have enabled finer in vivo assessment of the human retinal microvasculature. AOSLO confocal reflectance imaging has been coupled with oral fluorescein angiography (FA), enabling simultaneous acquisition of structural and perfusion images. AOSLO offset pinhole (OP) imaging combined with motion contrast post-processing techniques, are able to create a similar set of structural and perfusion images without the use of exogenous contrast agent. In this study, we evaluate the similarities and differences of the structural and perfusion images obtained by either method, in healthy control subjects and in patients with retinal vasculopathy including hypertensive retinopathy, diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion. Our results show that AOSLO OP motion contrast provides perfusion maps comparable to those obtained with AOSLO FA, while AOSLO OP reflectance images provide additional information such as vessel wall fine structure not as readily visible in AOSLO confocal reflectance images. AOSLO OP offers a non-invasive alternative to AOSLO FA without the need for any exogenous contrast agent.

Comments

Accepted version. Biomedical Optics Express, Vol. 5, No. 4 (March 2014): 1173-1189. DOI. © 2014 Optical Society of America. Used with permission.

Recommended Citation

Chui, Toco Y.P.; Dubow, Michael; Pinhas, Alexander; Shah, Nishit; Gan, Alexander; Weitz, Rishard; Sulai, Yusufu N.; Dubra, Alfredo; and Rosen, Richard B., "Comparison of Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopic Fluorescein Angiography and Offset Pinhole Imaging" (2014). Biomedical Engineering Faculty Research and Publications. 322.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/322