<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>College of Professional Studies Faculty Research and Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Marquette University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac</link>
<description>Recent documents in College of Professional Studies Faculty Research and Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:46:47 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>The Brief Standardized Communication Assessment: A Patient Stimulation Method Feasible for Population-Scale Use in Communication Quality Assurance</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/15</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:54:53 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Farrell et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Relationship Between Nurses’ Religiosity and Willingness to let Patients Control the Conversation about End-of-Life Care</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/14</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/14</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:47:39 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><h4 id="x-x-absSec_N2cad44d8N2da840c0">Objective</h4></p>
<p>The study attempts to examine the relationship between nurses’ religious beliefs and how nurses communicate with patients.  <h4 id="x-x-absSec_N2cad44d8N2da84120">Method</h4></p>
<p>An  online census survey was administered to graduate students in the  School of Nursing at a Midwestern university. The survey was designed to  measure: relational control, as measured by the subscales of dominance  and task orientation in Burgoon and Hale's scale of relational  communication; clinician empathy, as measured by the Jefferson scale of  clinician empathy; and intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, whether  religious views are held for deep personal reasons or social reasons, as  measured by the Maltby and Lewis scale. Data were analyzed using  multiple regressions and one-way ANOVAs.  <h4 id="x-x-absSec_N2cad44d8N2da84180">Results</h4></p>
<p>Intrinsic  religiosity and empathy were both associated with the willingness to  relinquish relational control in certain, specific contexts, such as  end-of-life care.  <h4 id="x-x-absSec_N2cad44d8N2da841e0">Conclusion</h4></p>
<p>Nurses  who scored higher on a scale of intrinsic religious beliefs were more  willing to let patients take control of conversations about end-of-life  care.  <h4 id="x-x-absSec_N2cad44d8N2da84240">Practice implications</h4></p>
<p>A  nurse's religious beliefs can enhance the clinical experience without  the nurse trying to impose his or her beliefs on the patient, as the  nurse works to make sure the patient's religious beliefs are upheld.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Stephanie Christopher</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Child Health Providers&apos; Precautionary Discussion of Emotions During Communication about Results of Newborn Genetic Screening</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/13</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/13</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:38:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><strong>Objective </strong> To demonstrate a quantitative abstraction method for  Communication Quality Assurance projects to assess physicians'  communication about hidden emotions after newborn genetic screening.</p>
<p><strong>Design </strong> Communication quality indicator analysis.</p>
<p><strong>Setting </strong> Standardized parent encounters performed in practicing physicians' clinics or during educational workshops for residents.</p>
<p><strong>Participants </strong> Fifty-nine pediatrics residents, 53 pediatricians, and 31 family physicians.</p>
<p><strong>Intervention </strong> Participants were asked to counsel standardized  parents about a screening result; counseling was recorded, transcribed,  and parsed into statements (each with 1 subject and 1 predicate). Pairs  of abstractors independently compared statements with a data dictionary  containing explicit-criteria definitions.</p>
<p><strong>Outcome Measures </strong> Four groups of "precautionary empathy"  behaviors (assessment of emotion, anticipation/validation of emotion,  instruction about emotion, and caution about future emotion), with  definitions developed for both "definite" and "partial" instances.</p>
<p><strong>Results </strong> Only 38 of 143 transcripts (26.6%) met definite criteria  for at least 1 of the precautionary empathy behaviors. When partial  criteria were counted, this number increased to 80 of 143 transcripts  (55.9%). The most common type of precautionary empathy was the  "instruction about emotion" behavior (eg, "don't be worried"), which may  sometimes be leading or premature.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions </strong> Precautionary empathy behaviors were rare in this  analysis. Further study is needed, but this study should raise concerns  about the quality of communication services after newborn screening.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Farrell et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Patient safety culture in nursing: a dimensional concept analysis</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/12</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:22:28 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><strong>Title. </strong><strong>Patient safety culture in nursing: a dimensional concept analysis.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Aim. </strong> This paper is a report of a dimensional concept analysis of patient safety culture in nursing.</p>
<p><strong>Background. </strong> Patient safety is an important issue in healthcare organizations. As  the release of Institute of Medicine reports in the United States of  America, substantial interest has arisen in studying patient safety  culture; however, the concept remains poorly defined.</p>
<p><strong>Data sources. </strong> Multiple databases, including CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and  Anthropological Index Online, were searched from 1970 to 2006. A keyword  search method was employed followed by a combined key word search.</p>
<p><strong>Review methods. </strong> A concept analysis based on Caron and Bowers’ method was carried out  using 45 papers, three books and three theses after examination of the  abstracts to identify definitions, dimensions, perspectives and  consequences needed for content and dimensional analyses.</p>
<p><strong>Findings. </strong> Nurses’ shared values, beliefs and behavioural norms towards patient  safety were identified as the overarching dimensions of the patient  safety culture. The four sub-dimensions of patient safety culture were  synthesized as system, personal, task-associated and interaction. Two  main philosophical perspectives, functional and interpretative, were  added to the analysis and further clarification was provided.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion. </strong> It is expected that understanding the nature, as well as the key  elements of the concept, would assist with analysing the existing safety  culture and help to determine the strategies to build or shape the  safety culture.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Xianqiong Feng et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A method to quantify residents&apos; jargon use during counseling of standardized patients about cancer screening</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/11</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:29:26 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><h3>Background  </h3> Jargon is a barrier to  effective patient-physician communication, especially when health  literacy is low or the topic is complicated.                Jargon is addressed by medical schools and residency  programs, but reducing jargon usage by the many physicians already in                practice may require the population-scale methods used in  Quality Improvement.    <h3>Objective  </h3> To assess the amount of  jargon used and explained during discussions about prostate or breast  cancer screening. Effective                communication is recommended before screening for  prostate or breast cancer because of the large number of false-positive                results and the possible complications from evaluation or  treatment.    <h3>Participants  </h3> Primary care internal medicine residents.    <h3>Measurements  </h3> Transcripts of 86  conversations between residents and standardized patients were  abstracted using an explicit-criteria data                dictionary. Time lag from jargon words to explanations  was measured using “statements,” each of which contains one subject                and one predicate.    <h3>Results  </h3> Duplicate abstraction  revealed reliability κ = 0.92. The average number of unique jargon words  per transcript was 19.6 (SD = 6.1);                the total jargon count was 53.6 (SD = 27.2). There was an  average of 4.5 jargon-explanations per transcript (SD = 2.3). The                ratio of explained to total jargon was 0.15. When jargon  was explained, the average time lag from the first usage to the  explanation                was 8.4 statements (SD = 13.4).    <h3>Conclusions  </h3> The large number of  jargon words and low number of explanations suggest that many patients  may not understand counseling about                cancer screening tests. Educational programs and faculty  development courses should continue to discourage jargon usage. The                methods presented here may be useful for feedback and  quality improvement efforts.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Lindsay Deuster et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A method to quantify and compare clinicians&apos; assessments of patient understanding during counseling of standardized patients</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/10</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:14:46 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><h4>Objective</h4></p>
<p>To introduce a method for quantifying clinicians’ use of assessment of understanding (AU) questions, and to examine medicine residents’ AU usage during counseling of standardized patients about prostate or breast cancer screening.  <h4>Methods</h4></p>
<p>Explicit-criteria abstraction was done on 86 transcripts, using a data dictionary for 4 AU types. We also developed a procedure for estimating the “load” of informational content for which the clinician has not yet assessed understanding.  <h4>Results</h4></p>
<p>Duplicate abstraction revealed reliability <em>κ</em> = 0.96. Definite criteria for at least one AU were found in 68/86 transcripts (79%). Of these, 2 transcripts contained a request for a teach-back (“what is your understanding of this?”), 2 contained an open-ended AU, 46 (54%) contained only a close-ended AU, and 18 (21%) only contained an “OK?” question. The load calculation identified long stretches of conversation without an AU.  <h4>Conclusion</h4></p>
<p>Many residents’ transcripts lacked AUs, and included AUs were often ineffectively phrased or inefficiently timed. Many patients may not understand clinicians, and many clinicians may be unaware of patients’ confusion.  <h4>Practice implications</h4></p>
<p>Effective AU usage is important enough to be encouraged by training programs and targeted by population-scale quality improvement programs. This quantitative method should be useful in population-scale measurement of AU usage.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Farrell et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Pediatric residents&apos; use of jargon during counseling about newborn genetic screening results</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/9</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:34:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>OBJECTIVE. The goal was to investigate pediatric residents’ usage of jargon during discussions about positive newborn screening test results.</p>
<p>METHODS. An explicit-criteria abstraction procedure was used to identify jargon usage and explanations in transcripts of encounters between residents and standardized parents of a fictitious infant found to carry cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Residents were recruited from a series of educational workshops on how to inform parents about positive newborn screening test results. The time lag from jargon words to explanations was measured by using “statements,” each of which contained 1 subject and 1 predicate.</p>
<p>RESULTS. Duplicate abstraction revealed reliability of 0.92. The average number of unique jargon words per transcript was 20; the total jargon count was 72.3 words. There was an average of 7.5 jargon explanations per transcript, but the explained/ total jargon ratio was only 0.17. When jargon was explained, the average time lag from the first usage to the explanation was 8.2 statements.</p>
<p>CONCLUSION. The large number of jargon words and the small number of explanations suggest that physicians’ counseling about newborn screening may be too complex for some parents. Pediatrics 2008;122:243–249</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Farrell et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Relationship between Nurses’ Religiosity and Willingness to Let Patients Control the Conversation about End-of-Life Care</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/8</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:45:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><strong>Objective</strong>: The study attempts to examine the relationship between nurses’ religious beliefs and how nurses communicate with patients.</p>
<p><strong>Method</strong>: An online census survey was administered to graduate students in the School of Nursing at a Midwestern university. The survey was designed to measure: relational control, as measured by the subscales of dominance and task orientation in Burgoon and Hale’s scale of relational communication; clinician empathy, as measured by the Jefferson scale of clinician empathy; and intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, whether religious views are held for deep personal reasons or social reasons, as measured by the Maltby and Lewis scale. Data were analyzed using multiple regressions and one-way ANOVAs.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong>: Intrinsic religiosity and empathy were both associated with the willingness to relinquish relational control in certain, specific contexts, such as end-of-life care.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong>: Nurses who scored higher on a scale of intrinsic religious beliefs were more willing to let patients take control of conversations about end-of-life care.</p>
<p><strong>Practice implications</strong>: A nurse’s religious beliefs can enhance the clinical experience without the nurse trying to impose his or her beliefs on the patient, as the nurse works to make sure the patient’s religious beliefs are upheld.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Christopher Stephanie</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>What Motivates Students to Provide Feedback to Teachers About Teaching and Learning? An Expectancy Theory Perspective</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/7</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:31:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The purpose of this empirical research study was to investigate what motivates students to provide formative anonymous feedback to teachers regarding their perceptions of the teaching and learning experience in order to improve student learning. Expectancy theory, specifically Vroom’s Model, was used as the conceptual framework for the study. Multiple regression analysis was employed to test both the valence and force equations. Statistically significant results indicated that students’ motivation was dependent upon the importance to them of improving the value of the class and of future classes, and the expectation that their formative feedback would lead to increased value for them, their peers in the classroom and for students in future classes. Based on these findings, it is important for teachers who request students to participate in providing anonymous feedback to emphasize that this feedback is a valuable tool to assist in improving current and future teaching and learning experiences.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Johnette Caulfield</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Applying Graduate Student Perceptions of Task Engagement to Enhance Learning Conditions</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/6</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:31:23 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Under what conditions are graduate students most likely to learn? How do we, as teachers, best create those conditions? The answer to these questions was the focus of this study whereby 91 masters’ students identified learning tasks that were most and least engaging. A model utilizing affective, behavioral and cognitive attributes was developed to measure graduate student engagement in learning tasks. Student survey data demonstrated a direct relationship between perceived value of the learning task, perceived effort put forth in achieving the learning task and perceived student engagement in learning. Multiple regression was used to predict engagement; two attributes, value and effort, predicted 93.2% of the variance in student learning task engagement. Results derived from a repeated measures t-test indicated that students performed significantly better, as measured by grades (<em>p</em> = .003), on learning tasks identified as most engaging when compared to learning tasks identified as least engaging.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Johnette Caulfield</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Impact of Nurses&apos; Religiosity on their Willingness to Relinquish Relational Control in Conversations with Patients about End-of-life Care</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 07:43:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Stephanie Christopher</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Learning to Communicate in Multi-Disciplinary Teams</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 07:16:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Stephanie Christopher</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Learning from the Past and Looking to the Future: A Conversation between Pamela Tate and Robert Deahl about the Past 35 Years in Adult Learning</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:24:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>None Provided</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Pamela Tate et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Catholic Intellectual Tradition: Where Is It Today?</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/2</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:31:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Deahl</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Marquette&apos;s Successful Harley Partnership Provides Smooth Ride for All</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_fac/1</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:23:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Deahl</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
