Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-2006

Source Publication

The Regional Economist

Source ISSN

1932-4707

Abstract

To restrict predatory lending in the subprime (high cost) mortgage market, Congress enacted in 1994 the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA). This law restricts some types of lending and requires lenders to disclose additional information about loans that have predatory features. Following the lead of federal regulations, at least 23 states, beginning with North Carolina in 1999, have introduced their own predatory lending laws, using HOEPA as a template.1

Perhaps not surprisingly, research focusing on the impact of the North Carolina law found that the rate of applications and originations for subprime loans declined after the law took effect. We extend prior research, which focused on the North Carolina law, and find large variations in market responses to the state predatory lending laws. These results suggest that a closer look at the design of the laws is needed. If market responses are contingent on how a law is written, then policy-makers may be able to craft predatory lending laws to either stimulate or depress the subprime market.

Comments

Published version. Regional Economist (January 2006): 12-13. Permalink. Originally published in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis The Regional Economist. © 2006 by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. All views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis or the Federal Reserve System.

Anthony Pennington-Cross was affiliated with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at the time of publication.