<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Finance Faculty Research and Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Marquette University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac</link>
<description>Recent documents in Finance Faculty Research and Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:46:02 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Catering Driven Substitution in Corporate Payouts</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/74</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/74</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:01:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper investigates catering as a motivation for substitution between share repurchases and dividend payments. I hypothesize that firms cater to investor demand by repurchasing shares when investors place a premium on the stock price of firms that repurchase shares, and by paying dividends when investors place a higher value on dividend-paying firms. I propose a proxy to measure the relative preference for repurchases over dividends — the difference premium. Results show that the decision to repurchase shares or to pay dividends depends on this premium. Firms channel higher fractions of the additional payout dollars toward share repurchases when this premium is high. The market reaction to dividend changes is more favorable when firms act in accordance with the catering hypothesis. Overall, I find that catering plays a role in the substitution between repurchases and dividends.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Manoj Kulchania</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Market Microstructure Changes Around Accelerated Share Repurchase Announcements</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/73</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/73</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:01:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>I investigate the impact on trading characteristics of firms announcing share repurchases using a relatively new buyback method—accelerated share repurchases (ASRs). I find that trading costs decrease and market quality improves following an ASR announcement. The improvement in liquidity is not accompanied by significant changes in information asymmetry or price volatility. Multivariate tests show that the change in volatility and the presence of price constraints in the ASR agreement are significant in explaining the changes in spreads, but the reasons given by firms for conducting the ASRs are not. Thus, in the case of ASRs, the announced involvement of an investment bank buying shares on behalf of the firm improves liquidity without significantly affecting the level of information asymmetry.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Manoj Kulchania</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Short Sale Constraints and Short Selling Strategies</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/72</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/72</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:46:33 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Marcus Braga-Alves et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Predicting Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/71</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/71</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:42:26 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Marcus Braga-Alves et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Naked Short Selling and Market Returns</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/70</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/70</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 10:26:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Boulton and Braga-Alves study persistent failures to deliver (fails) to better understand naked short sellers’ trading strategies, their ability to profit from their trades, and the market’s reaction to information about their activities. Contrary to recent claims that naked short sellers are momentum traders who drive down stock prices, they find that returns are typically positive just prior to periods of increased naked short selling that result in persistent fails and that returns generally remain positive for several weeks afterward. Their results also suggest that stocks that experience persistent fails are susceptible to short squeezes as shares move from a normal state in which short exposure is established by borrowing and selling to a hard-to-borrow state in which fails become a more attractive option for establishing short exposure.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Thomas J. Boulton et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Firm Location and Corporate Debt</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/69</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/69</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 08:31:28 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This study examines the influence of a firm’s geographical location on corporate debt and provides evidence that the higher cost of collecting information on firms distant from urban areas has significant implications on a wide array of corporate debt characteristics. We find that rural firms face higher debt yield spreads and attract smaller and less prestigious bank syndicates than urban firms. Rural firms attempt to reduce their informational disadvantage by relying more on relationship banking. Our results on the effect of location on corporate debt are robust to the inclusion of an extensive set of firm and issue characteristics.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Matteo Arena et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Mortgage Product Substitution and State Anti-Predatory Lending Laws: Better Loans and Better Borrowers?</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/68</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/68</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:56:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Mounting foreclosures and recent disclosures of abusive lending practices have led many states to adopt new anti-predatory lending laws. Researchers have examined the impact of such laws on credit flows and the cost of credit. This research extends the literature by examining if the market responded to these laws by substituting different mortgage products for those restricted by antipredatory lending provisions. The evidence indicates that the new laws were effective in restricting loans with targeted characteristics and that the market substituted other product types to maintain affordability in the face of these restrictions.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Raphael W. Bostic et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Effect of Taxes on Multinational Debt Location</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/67</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/67</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:33:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We provide new evidence that differences in international tax rates and  tax regimes affect multinational firms' debt location decisions. Our  sample contains 8287 debt issues from 2437 firms headquartered in 23  different countries with debt-issuing subsidiaries in 59 countries. We  analyze firms' marginal decisions of where to issue debt to investigate  the influence of a comprehensive set of tax-related effects, including  differences in personal and corporate tax rates, tax credit and  exemption systems, and bi-lateral cross-country withholding taxes on  interest and dividend payments. Our results show that differences in  personal and corporate tax rates, the presence of dividend imputation or  relief tax systems, the tax treatment of repatriated profits, and  inter-country withholding taxes on dividends and interest significantly  influence the decision of where to locate debt and the proportion of  debt located abroad. Our results are robust to firm and issue specific  factors and to the effect of legal regimes, debt market development, and  exchange rate risk.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Matteo Arena et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>It Takes Two: The Incidence and Effectiveness of Co-CEOs</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/66</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/66</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:18:15 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This study examines the phenomenon of co-CEOs  within publicly traded firms. Although shared executive leadership is  not widespread, it occurs within some very prominent firms. We find that  co-CEOs generally complement each other in terms of educational background or executive responsibilities. Our results show that firms most likely to appoint co-CEOs  have lower leverage, a more limited firm focus, less independent board  structure, fewer advising directors, lower institutional ownership and greater levels of merger activity. The governance structure of  co-CEO firms suggest that co-CEOships can serve as an alternative  governance mechanism, with co-CEO mutual monitoring substituting for  board or external monitoring and co-CEO  complementary skills substituting for board advising. An event study  indicates that the market reacts positively to appointments of co-CEOs while a propensity score analysis shows that the presence of co-CEOs increases firm valuation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Matteo Arena et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Impact of State Anti-Predatory Lending Laws: Policy Implications and Insights</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/65</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/65</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:06:21 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The subprime mortgage market, which consists of high-cost loans designed  for borrowers with weak credit, has grown tremendously over the past  ten years. Between 1993 and 2005, the subprime market experienced an  average annual growth rate of 26 percent. As this market emerged, so did  allegations that subprime loans contained predatory features or were  the result of predatory sales practices.3 In the worst cases, brokers  deceived borrowers about the meaning of loan terms or falsely promised  to assist them in obtaining future refinance loans with better terms. In  other situations, borrowers entered into loans with low teaser rates,  not aware how high their monthly payments could go when their interest  rates reset. Many policy-makers across the country agree that subprime  loans provide an important vehicle for making credit available to  consumers; however, concerns about abuses in the subprime market have  led the federal government and most states to enact laws that place  limits on subprime lending. The federal government led the way with the  Home Ownership Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), which was enacted in 1994.  A growing number of states followed suit, passing laws modeled on HOEPA  (known as “mini-HOEPA laws”). Today, well over half the states have  anti-predatory lending statutes of one kind or another. These laws vary  in terms of the loans they cover, the practices they prohibit, and the  methods of enforcement they permit. In addition to the mini-HOEPA laws,  numerous states have laws that pre-date HOEPA and prohibit specific loan  terms such as prepayment penalties or balloon payments. These laws  function alone or alongside more comprehensive mini-HOEPA laws.  As home  mortgage default and foreclosures rates have escalated in recent years,  antipredatory lending measures have moved into the policy limelight.  Lenders and others in the mortgage industry claim that the laws drive up  the cost and reduce the availability of credit, especially to  low-income borrowers. In contrast, those who endorse the laws argue that  they are needed to protect vulnerable consumers and the communities in  which they live. They further argue that any costs are de minimis  relative to the protection the laws provide. Any laws that place  restrictions on loan terms and lending practices invariably have some  effect on credit flows in the home mortgage market. Until recently, the  nature and extent of those effects have only been speculative. The  availability of loan pricing and other data now makes it possible to  evaluate the impact of laws on the flow and cost of credit. In this  chapter, we review past studies on the impact of anti-predatory lending  laws and describe the results of our own research, which expands on  prior studies by: (1) using a more nuanced legal index; (2) examining  anti-predatory lending laws that pre-date HOEPA as well as the HOEPA  analogues; (3) looking at the role of enforcement mechanisms, including  assignee liability laws, on loan volumes; and (4) disaggregating  anti-predatory lending laws along three dimensions—coverage,  restrictions, and enforcement.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Raphael W. Bostic et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Measuring External Shocks to the City Economy: An Index of Export Prices and Terms of Trade</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/64</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/64</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:00:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper details the construction of an index of export goods prices (the Export Price Index or <em>EPI</em>) for a panel of 196 metropolitan areas from 1977 to 1992. The <em>EPI</em> is an indicator of external demand shocks to the city economy which  does not suffer from the causal ambiguity of the endogenous indicators  such as income, employment or output. The creation of an index of  aggregate export prices, the <em>EPI</em>, for the panel of areas  provides both academicians and policy analysts with a new exogenous  indicator that identifies demand price innovations and the terms of  trade shocks to cities.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anthony Pennington-Cross</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Credit History and the FHA-Conventional Choice</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/63</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/63</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:48:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Models explaining whether households choose conventional or FHA mortgage  financing typically use differential insurance premiums, loan-to-value  (LTV) and payment-to-income underwriting standards, and local economic  conditions to explain household behavior. Using a large and  geographically diverse sample, we expand the standard choice model by  including measures of borrower credit history. We find that the ability  of a homebuyer to avoid credit problems is an important part of the  FHA–conventional choice. In addition, credit scores of FHA borrowers are  worse on average than those of conventional borrowers, but as LTV  increases credit scores of conventional borrowers deteriorate.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anthony Pennington-Cross et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Local Economic Risk Factors on the Primary and Secondary Mortgage Markets</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/62</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/62</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:43:08 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper presents a cross-sectional analysis of the spatial  distribution of loans in the primary and secondary mortgage markets.  Aggregating loan originations to the MSA level, we examine the  proportion of the market served by FHA and conventional lenders. We  model the geographic differences in market shares as a function of  supply, demand, and economic risk factors. Results indicate that FHA  market shares are higher in cities with higher economic risk  characteristics. To examine the role of GSE activity, we model the  spatial distribution of the disposition of conventional loans. Again, we  focus on the impact of local economic risk factors on the proportion of  loans purchased by the GSEs, purchased by other financial institutions,  or retained by the originating lender. Our results indicate that GSEs  purchase rates are fairly insensitive to local economic conditions  indicating that they serve the primary market with little spatial  variation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Brent W. Ambrose et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Federal Housing Administration in the New Millenium</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/61</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/61</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:39:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The first challenge in attempting to predict the future of the Federal  Housing Administration (FHA) is to understand why it is still here. No  other depression-era mortgage-market institution has survived without  substantial modification. We conclude that its survival has depended on  its ability to invent new purposes for itself. For example, it changed  from a replacement for failed private mortgage insurance using economic  soundness as an insurance criterion to an innovator in high-risk lending  based on an acceptable risk criterion. FHA has developed special  programs to serve the needs of specific groups. We believe this pattern  of change in purposes also is the key to FHA survival in the new  millennium., We review potential future purposes for FHA and find that  severalparticularly, maintaining mortgage credit flows in declining  regional housing marketswill require a substantial FHA presence in  mortgage markets. This is important because it implies that a  marginalized FHA cannot serve several of the important purposes that it  is likely to be asked to serve in the new millennium. Accordingly, we  believe that FHA market share will be maintained and perhaps expanded in  the new millennium, even with increasing competition from conventional  lending.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anthony Pennington-Cross et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The Evolution of Real Estate in the Economy</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/60</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/60</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:29:59 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper examines economic indicators to show how the role of the real  estate industry in the economy has evolved over time. This examination  spans the early 1980s through 1999. Our key conclusion includes the  followings. In terms of economic flows real estate is as important a  part of the economy as ever. About 11% of GDP each year is attributable  to the real estate industry. Some parts of the industry, especially  those finance and capital market related, have increased share in GDP,  while others (services) have remained constant or even shrunk.</p>
<p>In a  stock measure, household and corporation asset allocations have shown  significantly lower shares for real estate. The strong performance of  the stock market, growth in household wealth combined with a relatively  low income elasticity of demand for housing, and changed corporate  behavior appear to have contributed to this decline.</p>
<p>The values  of real estate in debt and equity markets have increased substantially.  Securitizations of mortgage and commercial mortgage have made real  estate an increasingly important component in debt market. The  prominence of real estate investment trusts (REITs) in the stock market  has increased since 1985. However it remains a very small fraction of  the overall equity market.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dapeng Hu et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Managers’ incentives to manipulate earnings in management buyout contests: An examination of how corporate governance and market mechanisms mitigate earnings management</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/59</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/59</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:20:34 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In an MBO contest, managers offer to buy the firm from public shareholders at a premium to the current market price and thus have incentives to buy the firm “cheap.” Prior studies have found evidence that managers, on average, manipulate earnings downward prior to an MBO offer in an attempt to convince shareholders that their offer is fair. We extend this finding by attempting to explain the substantial cross sectional variation in the degree of manipulation across firms reported in these earlier studies. We find that boards with more independent directors and higher levels of incentive based compensation for the CEO act to discourage such manipulation. Additionally, our results show that some shareholders, minority and preexisting large outside blockholders, appear to be misled by the manipulation. However, new blockholders that acquire large shareholdings in the year before the offer are not. We also discover that managers are more likely to revise their bid upwards when the manipulation is most severe and that these new blockholders put pressure on managers to make these revisions. Finally, we investigate whether the manipulation has an impact on the final buyout contest outcome. We find that downward manipulation does not prevent managers from retaining control of the firm; however, they pay a higher premium.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Joy Begley et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Do Outside Blockholders Influence Corporate Governance Practices?</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/58</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/58</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:16:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This study investigates whether block acquisitions lead to changes in  board and CEO compensation characteristics and finds that block  purchasers do not play a significant role in improving the firm’s  governance practices. However, the majority of professional investors  have sold their block within a year, suggesting that they do not own  their stock long enough to alter governance policies nor to benefit from  such changes. For the smaller number of firms where a new blockholder  maintains their investment for more than a year, the use of equity based  CEO compensation increases while the use of cash based compensation  decreases.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sarah Peck</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Large Scale Shopping Center Development Opportunities</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/57</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/57</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:57:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper develops a model with cross-patronage effects between anchor  tenant department stores and smaller non-anchor tenants to examine the  development opportunities for large-scale shopping centers in the U.S. A  major theme of the analysis is that large-scale shopping center  development opportunities in the U.S. have been affected by demand  changes brought about by rising income levels and the way individuals  value and use time. Our analysis shows that these trends lead directly  to increased development opportunities for large-scale shopping centers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>James D. Shilling et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Changing Economic Perspectives on the Theory of Retail Location, Chapter 5</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/56</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/56</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:52:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>James D. Shilling et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Valuing the New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands</title>
<link>http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/55</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/55</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:42:47 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This study assesses the impact of new urbanism on single-family home  prices. Specifically, we use Duany and Plater-Zyberk's traditional  neighborhood development (TND) of Kentlands and surrounding conventional  subdivisions to estimate the premium, if any, that single-family  homeowners are willing to pay to reside in a community with new urbanist  features. Using data on 2,061 single-family home transactions and  several hedonic price models, the empirical evidence reveals that  consumers are willing to pay a premium to locate in Kentlands.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Charles C. Tu et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
