Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2011

Source Publication

Family Business Review

Abstract

We survey arguments that family firms should behave more like non-family firms and “professionalize”. Despite the apparent advantages of this transition, many family firms fail to do so or do so only partially. We reflect on why this might be so, and the range of possible modes of professionalization. We derive six ideal types: (1) minimally professional family firms; (2) wealth dispensing, private family firms; (3) entrepreneurially operated family firms; (4) entrepreneurial family business groups; (5) pseudo-professional, public family firms; and (6) hybrid professional family firms. We conclude with suggestions for further research that is attentive to such variation.

Keywords: Professionalization; family firms; performance; entrepreneurship; hybrid organizations

Comments

Author version. Family Business Review, Vol. 25 No. 1 (2011). DOI: 10.1177/0894486511421665