Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

22 p.

Publication Date

9-2012

Publisher

Springer

Source Publication

Atlantic Economic Journal

Source ISSN

0197-4254

Abstract

Mounting foreclosures and disclosures of abusive lending practices led many states to adopt new anti-predatory lending (APL) laws. Researchers have examined the impact of such laws on credit flows and the cost of credit. This research extends the literature by examining whether the market responded to these laws by substituting different mortgage products for those restricted by APL provisions. The evidence indicates that the laws were effective in restricting loans with targeted characteristics, and that the market substituted other product types to maintain access to credit and affordability in the face of these restrictions. The laws reduced the involvement of investor and second home purchases but appeared to impact borrower credit scores or down payments.

Comments

Accepted version. Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3 (September 2012): 273-294. DOI. © 2012 Springer. Used with permission.

Shareable Link. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative.

Share

COinS