Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
11 p.
Publication Date
3-1-2011
Publisher
Elsevier
Source Publication
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Source ISSN
1369-8478
Abstract
The increasing number of hybrid and quiet internal combustion engine vehicles may impact the travel abilities of pedestrians who are blind. Pedestrians who rely on auditory cues for structuring their travel may face challenges in making crossing decisions in the presence of quiet vehicles. This article describes results of initial studies looking at the crossing decisions of pedestrians who are blind at an uncontrolled crossing (no traffic control) and a light controlled intersection. The presence of hybrid vehicles was a factor in each situation. At the uncontrolled crossing, Toyota hybrids were most difficult to detect but crossing decisions were made more often in small gaps ended by a Honda hybrid. These effects were seen only at speed under 20 mph. At the light controlled intersection, parallel surges of traffic were most difficult to detect when made up only of a Ford Escape hybrid. Results suggest that more controlled studies of vehicle characteristics impacting crossing decisions of pedestrians who are blind are warranted.
Recommended Citation
Emerson, Robert Wall; Naghshineh, Koorosh; Hapeman, Julie; and Wiener, William, "A Pilot Study of Pedestrians with Visual Impairments Detecting Traffic Gaps and Surges Containing Hybrid Vehicles" (2011). College of Education Faculty Research and Publications. 368.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/edu_fac/368
Comments
Accepted version. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 14, No. 2 (March 2011): 117-127. DOI. © 2011 Elsevier. Used with permission.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, VOL 14, ISSUE 2, March 1, 2011.