Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2017
Publisher
National Council of Teachers of English
Source Publication
College English
Source ISSN
0010-0994
Original Item ID
DOI: 10.58680/ce201729159
Abstract
This article sheds light on moments when educators affirm and when writers assert their epistemic rights— the rights to knowledge, experience, and earned expertise. Affirmations and assertions of epistemic rights can work to counter epistemic injustice, or harm done to people in their capacities as knowers. Though an understanding of rhetoric as "epistemic" or "epistemological" is not new (e.g., Berlin; Dowst; Scott; Villanueva), I argue that we need to bring attention to the related terms and conceptual frameworks of epistemic rights and epistemic injustice. Together, these terms help to explain the wrongs (micro-inequities leading to macro-injustices) that manifest when writers are stripped of language, experience, or expertise and their attendant agency, confidence, and even personhood. This study highlights both the social stakes involved and the interactional work needed for putting one's words into the world. Hence, this project contributes empirical research in addition to an understanding of epistemic rights that can counter epistemic injustice.
Recommended Citation
Godbee, Beth, "Writing Up: How Assertions of Epistemic Rights Counter Epistemic Injustice" (2017). English Faculty Research and Publications. 378.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/english_fac/378
Comments
Published version. College English, Vol. 79, No. 6 (July 2017): 593-618. DOI. © 2017 National Council of Teachers of English. Used with permission.