Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
13 p.
Publication Date
10-2014
Publisher
Springer
Source Publication
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Source ISSN
1386-4416
Original Item ID
doi: 10.1007/s10857-013-9264-1
Abstract
In this study, we explored the relationship between prospective teachers’ algebraic thinking and the questions they posed during one-on-one diagnostic interviews that focused on investigating the algebraic thinking of middle school students. To do so, we evaluated prospective teachers’ algebraic thinking proficiency across 125 algebra-based tasks and we analyzed the characteristics of questions they posed during the interviews. We found that prospective teachers with lower algebraic thinking proficiency did not ask any probing questions. Instead, they either posed questions that simply accepted and affirmed student responses or posed questions that guided the students toward an answer without probing student thinking. In contrast, prospective teachers with higher algebraic thinking proficiency were able to pose probing questions to investigate student thinking or help students clarify their thinking. However, less than half of their questions were of this probing type. These results suggest that prospective teachers’ algebraic thinking proficiency is related to the types of questions they ask to explore the algebraic thinking of students. Implications for mathematics teacher education are discussed.
Recommended Citation
van den Kieboom, Leigh A.; Magiera, Marta T.; and Moyer, John C., "Exploring the Relationship between K-8 Prospective Teachers’ Algebraic Thinking Proficiency and the Questions They Pose during Diagnostic Algebraic Thinking Interviews" (2014). Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science Faculty Research and Publications. 207.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/mscs_fac/207
ADA Accessible Version
Included in
Computer Sciences Commons, Education Commons, Mathematics Commons, Statistics and Probability Commons
Comments
Accepted version. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Vol. 17, No. 5 (October 2014): 429-461. DOI. ©2014 Springer. Used with permission.
Shareable Link. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative.