Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Publication Date
11-2015
Publisher
Elsevier
Source Publication
General Hospital Psychiatry
Source ISSN
0163-8343
Original Item ID
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.018
Abstract
Objective
To understand emergency department (ED) providers’ perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators of suicide risk assessment and to use these perspectives to inform recommendations for best practices in ED suicide risk assessment.
Methods
Ninety-two ED providers from two hospital systems in a Midwestern state responded to open-ended questions via an online survey that assessed their perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to assess suicide risk as well as their preferred assessment methods. Responses were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.
Results
Qualitative analysis yielded six themes that impact suicide risk assessment. Time, privacy, collaboration and consultation with other professionals and integration of a standard screening protocol in routine care exemplified environmental and systemic themes. Patient engagement/participation in assessment and providers’ approach to communicating with patients and other providers also impacted the effectiveness of suicide risk assessment efforts.
Conclusions
The findings inform feasible suicide risk assessment practices in EDs. Appropriately utilizing a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to assess suicide-related concerns appears to be a promising approach to ameliorate the burden placed on ED providers and facilitate optimal patient care. Recommendations for clinical care, education, quality improvement and research are offered.
Recommended Citation
Petrik, Megan L.; Gutierrez, Peter M.; Berlin, Jon S.; and Saunders, Stephen M., "Barriers and Facilitators of Suicide Risk Assessment in Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study of Provider Perspectives" (2015). Psychology Faculty Research and Publications. 187.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/psych_fac/187
Comments
Accepted version. General Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 37, No. 6 (November/December 2015): 581–586. DOI. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Used with permission.