Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
9 p.
Publication Date
2011
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Source Publication
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Source ISSN
1380-3395
Original Item ID
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.511603
Abstract
Dimensional structures underlying the Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition (WMS–IV) and Wechsler Memory Scale–Third Edition (WMS–III) were compared to determine whether the revised measure has a more coherent and clinically relevant factor structure. Principal component analyses were conducted in normative samples reported in the respective technical manuals. Empirically supported procedures guided retention of dimensions. An invariant two-dimensional WMS–IV structure reflecting constructs of auditory learning/memory and visual attention/memory (C1 = .97; C2 = .96) is more theoretically coherent than the replicable, heterogeneous WMS–III dimension (C1 = .97). This research suggests that the WMS–IV may have greater utility in identifying lateralized memory dysfunction.
Recommended Citation
Hoelzle, James B.; Nelson, Nathaniel W.; and Smith, Clifford A., "Comparison of Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition (WMS–IV) and Third Edition (WMS–III) dimensional structures: Improved ability to evaluate auditory and visual constructs" (2011). Psychology Faculty Research and Publications. 26.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/psych_fac/26
Comments
Accepted version. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 283-291 (March, 2011). DOI. © 2011 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Used with permission.