Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
11 p.
Publication Date
3-2012
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Source Publication
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Source ISSN
0361-6843
Original Item ID
doi: 10.1177/0361684311427028
Abstract
Our study examined similarities and differences in women’s and men’s comparison tendencies and perfection beliefs when evaluating their face, body shape, and physical abilities, as well as how these tendencies and beliefs relate to their body esteem. College students (90 women and 88 men) completed the Body Esteem Scale (Franzoi & Shields, 1984) and answered questions concerning their social comparison and temporal comparison tendencies related to face, body shape, and physical abilities evaluations as well as personal perfection body beliefs. As predicted, women were more likely than men to compare their face and bodies to other same-sex persons whom they perceived as having either similar or better physical qualities than themselves in those body domains, with their most likely comparison tendency being upward social comparison. More men than women held body-perfection beliefs for all three body domains, and men were most likely to rely on future temporal comparison when evaluating their body shape. Comparison tendencies and perfection beliefs also were differentially related to women's and men's body esteem; whereas women rely on self-critical social comparison strategies associated with negative body esteem, men’s comparison strategies and perfection beliefs are more self-hopeful. Implications for practitioners treating body-image issues are discussed.
Recommended Citation
Franzoi, Stephen L.; Vasquez, Kris; Frost, Katherine; Sparapani, Erin; Martin, Jessica; and Aebly, Megan, "Exploring Body Comparison Tendencies: Women Are Self-Critical Whereas Men Are Self-Hopeful" (2012). Psychology Faculty Research and Publications. 77.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/psych_fac/77
Comments
Accepted version. Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1 (March 2012): 99-109. DOI. © 2012 SAGE Publications. Used with permission.