Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

9 p.

Publication Date

11-2016

Publisher

Elsevier

Source Publication

Water Research

Source ISSN

0043-1354

Original Item ID

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.012; PMID: 27522023

Abstract

Nine anaerobic digesters, each seeded with biomass from a different source, were operated identically and their quasi steady state function was compared. Subsequently, digesters were bioaugmented with a methanogenic culture previously shown to increase specific methanogenic activity. Before bioaugmentation, different seed biomass resulted in different quasi steady state function, with digesters clustering into three groups distinguished by methane (CH4) production. Digesters with similar functional performance contained similar archaeal communities based on clustering of Illumina sequence data of the V4V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene. High CH4 production correlated with neutral pH and high Methanosarcina abundance, whereas low CH4production correlated to low pH as well as high Methanobacterium and DHVEG 6 family abundance. After bioaugmentation, CH4 production from the high CH4 producing digesters transiently increased by 11 ± 3% relative to non-bioaugmented controls (p < 0.05, n = 3), whereas no functional changes were observed for medium and low CH4producing digesters that all had pH higher than 6.7. The CH4 production increase after bioaugmentation was correlated to increased relative abundance of Methanosaeta and Methaospirillum originating from the bioaugment culture. In conclusion, different anaerobic digester seed biomass can result in different quasi steady state CH4production, SCOD removal, pH and effluent VFA concentration in the timeframe studied. The bioaugmentation employed can result in a period of increased methane production. Future research should address extending the period of increased CH4 production by employing pH and VFA control concomitant with bioaugmentation, developing improved bioaugments, or employing a membrane bioreactor to retain the bioaugment.

Comments

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Water Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published Water Research, Vol. 104 (November 2016): 128-136. DOI. © 2016 Elsevier. Used with permission.


zitomer_9466sup1.pdf (211 kB)
Supplement 1

zitomer_9466sup2.pdf (224 kB)
Supplement 2

zitomer_9466sup3.pdf (345 kB)
Supplement 3

zitomer_9466sup4.pdf (142 kB)
Supplement 4

zitomer_9466sup5.pdf (181 kB)
Supplement 5

Share

COinS