Document Type




Format of Original

26 p.

Publication Date



SAGE Publications

Source Publication

Journal of Communication Inquiry

Source ISSN


Original Item ID

doi: 10.1177/0196859905285315


This semiotic analysis demonstrates how pharmaceutical companies strategically frame depression within the hotly contested terrain of direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising. The study tracks regulation of the pharmaceutical industry, relative to DTC advertising, including recent industry codes of conduct. Focusing on the antidepressant category, and its three major brands—Paxil (GlaxoSmithKline), Prozac (Eli Lilly), and Zoloft (Pfizer)—this comparative study analyzes 7 years of print advertising following deregulation in 1997. The authors glean themes from within the advertising texts, across the drug category and within individual-brand campaigns. The findings indicate that DTC advertising of antidepressants frames depression within the biochemical model of causation, privileges benefits over risks, fails to adequately educate consumers, and frames depression as a female condition. The authors close with commentary on the potential implications, with particular focus on the new codes of conduct, and offer suggestions for future research.


Accepted version. Journal of Communication Inquiry, Vol. 30, No. 2 (April 2006), DOI . © 2006 SAGE Publications. Used with permission.

Some images have been removed from this version of the article due to third-party copyright restrictions. The published version of the article is available here.

Included in

Communication Commons