Shear Bond Strength Comparison between Two Orthodontic Adhesives and Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets
Format of Original
The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc.
The Angle Orthodontist
Original Item ID
Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system.
Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blūgloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 40 ± 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring.
Results: The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P < .001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P > .05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P > .05) in ARI scores among all three groups.
Conclusions: All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.
Northrup, Rodney G.; Berzins, David W.; Bradley, T. Gerard; and Schuckit, William I., "Shear Bond Strength Comparison between Two Orthodontic Adhesives and Self-Ligating and Conventional Brackets" (2007). School of Dentistry Faculty Research and Publications. 103.
Published version. The Angle Orthodontist, Vol. 77, No. 4 (July 2007): 701-706. DOI. © 2007 The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. Used with permission.