Document Type




Format of Original

36 p.

Publication Date



Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

Source Publication

Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Source ISSN



Worldwide, dissertation experiences are acknowledged to be challenging endeavors for students and the faculty members who advise them, and dissertation completion continues to be a concern when seeking to improve overall doctoral graduation rates. Although a number of factors have been associated with completion rates across disciplines, further research is needed within professional psychology graduate programs to understand overall student dissertation experiences. In this USA-based investigation, a mixed-method design was used to examine the experiences of 25 professional psychology doctoral graduates’ dissertation experiences, 12 of which were self-identified as positive and 13 as negative. Participants with positive experiences typically had supportive relationships with their dissertation chairs and committee members, which enhanced their research confidence and professional development. Participants with negative dissertation experiences typically had difficult relationships with dissertation chairs and committee members, which was associated with immediate and long-lasting negative consequences for participants’ professional growth and emotional well-being. The advisory working alliance was stronger for graduates with positive than negative experiences, although research attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs were not different between the two groups.


Accepted version. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1 (2014): 19-54. DOI. © 2014 Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Used with permission.

burkard_5545acc.docx (80 kB)
ADA Accessible Version

Included in

Education Commons