Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Publication Date

Winter 2017

Publisher

Ball State University Center for Peace and Conflict Studies

Source Publication

Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology

Source ISSN

2159-8142

Abstract

While there has been increased attention to advocacy within counseling and counseling psychology, it has been noted that trainees generally feel unprepared to engage in advocacy and do not participant e in this type of work to a large extent, even with increased age or professional experience). The qualitative study summarizes the findings of a project within a graduate multicultural counseling course designed to increase trainee knowledge and confidence related to advocacy. This project required students (N = 19) to complete individual advocacy projects in the community, with opportunities for self-reflection and evaluation of their progress throughout the semester. Student reflection responses about the effects of this project were analyzed using methods from Grounded Theory by a collaborative research team. This process resulted in a core category of responses that included expanded definitions of advocacy, increased self-confidence regarding advocacy work, obstacles encountered, and reactions to the course assignment. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Comments

Published version. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Winter 2017): 79-94. Publisher link. © 2017 Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology. Used with permission.

Kevin A. Tate was affiliated with Wellesley College at the time of publication.

Cook_12008.pdf (899 kB)
ADA accessible version

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS