Active hyperemia and vascular conductance differ between men and women for an isometric fatiguing contraction
Format of Original
American Physiological Society
Journal of Applied Physiology
Original Item ID
To understand the role of muscle perfusion in the sex differences of muscle fatigue, we compared the time to task failure, postcontraction (active) hyperemia, and vascular conductance for an isometric fatiguing contraction performed by young men and women with the handgrip muscles at 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. In study 1, the men (n = 16) were stronger than the women (n = 18), and study 2, the men (n = 7) and women (n = 7) were matched for strength. Isometric contractions were sustained during two sessions: 1) until the target force could no longer be achieved or 2) for 4 min. For both studies, blood flow and vascular conductance were similar for the men and women at rest and after 10 min of occlusion, and at task failure for the fatiguing contraction estimated using forearm venous occlusion plethysmography. In study 1, the time to task failure was longer for the women (11.4 ± 2.8 min) than for the men (8.4 ± 2.4 min; P = 0.003). However, at the end of the 4-min contraction, active hyperemia and vascular conductance were greater for the men than the women (99 vs. 70% peak blood flow; P < 0.001). In study 2, the men and women had similar strength and a similar time to failure (8.4 ± 1.6 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3 min). Active hyperemia was greater for the men than the women (86 vs. 64% peak flow; P = 0.038) after the 4-min contraction, as was vascular conductance (80 vs. 57% peak conductance; P = 0.02). Thus the briefer time to failure of men than women for an isometric fatiguing contraction is a function of the greater strength of men but is not dependent on differences in the active hyperemia and vascular conductance.
Hunter, Sandra K.; Schletty, Jennie M.; Schlachter, Kristine M.; Griffith, Erin E.; Polichnowski, Aaron J.; and Ng, Alexander V., "Active hyperemia and vascular conductance differ between men and women for an isometric fatiguing contraction" (2006). Exercise Science Faculty Research and Publications. 5.
Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 101, No. 1 (July 2006): 140-150. DOI.