Mortgage Product Substitution and State Anti-Predatory Lending Laws: Better Loans and Better Borrowers?

Authors

Raphael W. Bostic, University of Southern CaliforniaFollow
Souphala ChomsisengphetFollow
Kathleen C. Engel, Suffolk University Law SchoolFollow
Patricia A. McCoy, University of Connecticut - School of LawFollow
Anthony Pennington-Cross, Marquette UniversityFollow
Susan M. Wachter, University of Pennsylvania

Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

51 p.

Publication Date

2008

Publisher

University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law and Economics

Source Publication

University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law and Economics

Abstract

Mounting foreclosures and recent disclosures of abusive lending practices have led many states to adopt new anti-predatory lending laws. Researchers have examined the impact of such laws on credit flows and the cost of credit. This research extends the literature by examining if the market responded to these laws by substituting different mortgage products for those restricted by antipredatory lending provisions. The evidence indicates that the new laws were effective in restricting loans with targeted characteristics and that the market substituted other product types to maintain affordability in the face of these restrictions.

Comments

University of Pennsylvania Institute for Law and Economics, Research Paper No. 09-27, (2008). Permalink.

Recommended Citation

Bostic, Raphael W.; Chomsisengphet, Souphala; Engel, Kathleen C.; McCoy, Patricia A.; Pennington-Cross, Anthony; and Wachter, Susan M., "Mortgage Product Substitution and State Anti-Predatory Lending Laws: Better Loans and Better Borrowers?" (2008). Finance Faculty Research and Publications. 68.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/fin_fac/68