Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

24 p.

Publication Date

Summer 2014

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Source Publication

Publius

Source ISSN

0048-5950

Original Item ID

doi: 10.1093/publius/pju023

Abstract

Throughout the Obama Administration, state attorneys general (AGs) have collaborated on several high-profile political issues. To get a fuller picture of this contemporary AG activism, this article analyzes AG participation in lawsuits and amicus curiae briefs before the U.S. Supreme Court across three presidential administrations. The results suggest that AGs’ agendas have increasingly diverged throughout the Obama Administration, reflecting greater vertical conflict between AGs and the federal government as well as horizontal conflict among AGs themselves. Several factors have contributed to this development, including the broader polarization of American politics, intensified activism among Republican AGs, and increased collaborations between AGs and ideological interest groups. Much as with partisan contestation in other venues, these AG conflicts show few signs of abating.

Comments

Accepted version. Publius, Vol. 44, No. 3 (Summer 2014): 451-474. DOI. © 2014 Oxford University Press. Used with permission.

Download

Share

COinS