Comparison of a Space Shuttle Flight (STS-78) and Bed Rest on Human Muscle Function
Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
8 p.
Publication Date
7-2001
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Source Publication
Journal of Applied Physiology
Source ISSN
0021-8987
Original Item ID
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.57
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to assess muscle fiber size, composition, and in vivo contractile characteristics of the calf muscle of four male crew members during a 17-day spaceflight (SF; Life and Microgravity Sciences Spacelab Shuttle Transport System-78 mission) and eight men during a 17-day bed rest (BR). The protocols and timelines of these two investigations were identical, therefore allowing for direct comparisons between SF and the BR. The subjects’ age, height, and weight were 43 +/- 2 yr, 183 +/- 4 cm, and 86 +/- 3 kg for SF and 43 +/- 2 yr, 182 +/- 3 cm, and 82 +/- 4 kg for BR, respectively. Calf muscle strength was examined before SF and BR; on days 2, 8, and 12 during SF and BR; and on days 2 and 8 of recovery. Muscle biopsies were obtained before and within 3 h after SF (gastrocnemius and soleus) and BR (soleus) before reloading. Maximal isometric calf strength and the force-velocity characteristics were unchanged with SF or BR. Additionally, neither SF nor BR had any effect on fiber composition or fiber size of the calf muscles studied. In summary, no changes in calf muscle strength and morphology were observed after the 17-day SF and BR. Because muscle strength is lost during unloading, both during spaceflight and on the ground, these data suggest that the testing sequence employed during the SF and BR may have served as a resistance training countermeasure to attenuate whole muscle strength loss.
Recommended Citation
Trappe, Scott W.; Trappe, Todd A.; Lee, Gary A.; Widrick, Jeffrey J.; Costill, David L.; and Fitts, Robert, "Comparison of a Space Shuttle Flight (STS-78) and Bed Rest on Human Muscle Function" (2001). Biological Sciences Faculty Research and Publications. 17.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/bio_fac/17
Comments
Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 91, No. 1 (July 2001): 57-64. DOI.