Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
13 p.
Publication Date
3-2016
Publisher
Elsevier
Source Publication
Decision Support Systems
Source ISSN
0167-9236
Abstract
Evidence from forecasting research gives reason to believe that understanding time series complexity can enable design of adaptive forecasting decision support systems (FDSSs) to positively support forecasting behaviors and accuracy of outcomes. Yet, such FDSS design capabilities have not been formally explored because there exists no systematic approach to identifying series complexity. This study describes the development and validation of a rule-based complexity scoring technique (CST) that generates a complexity score for time series using 12 rules that rely on 14 features of series. The rule-based schema was developed on 74 series and validated on 52 holdback series using well-accepted forecasting methods as benchmarks. A supporting experimental validation was conducted with 14 participants who generated 336 structured judgmental forecasts for sets of series classified as simple or complex by the CST. Benchmark comparisons validated the CST by confirming, as hypothesized, that forecasting accuracy was lower for series scored by the technique as complex when compared to the accuracy of those scored as simple. The study concludes with a comprehensive framework for design of FDSS that can integrate the CST to adaptively support forecasters under varied conditions of series complexity. The framework is founded on the concepts of restrictiveness and guidance and offers specific recommendations on how these elements can be built in FDSS to support complexity.
Recommended Citation
Adya, Monica and Lusk, Edward J., "Development and Validation of a Rule-based Time Series Complexity Scoring Technique to Support Design of Adaptive Forecasting DSS" (2016). Management Faculty Research and Publications. 229.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/mgmt_fac/229
Comments
Accepted version. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 83 (March 2016): 70–82. DOI. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. Used with permission.