Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Format of Original
15 p.
Publication Date
11-1-2011
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Source Publication
Journal of Neurophysiology
Source ISSN
0022-3077
Original Item ID
doi: 10.1152/jn.00763.2010
Abstract
We examined elbow muscle activities and movement kinematics to determine how subjects combine elementary control actions in performing movements with one and two trajectory segments. In reaching, subjects made a rapid elbow flexion to a visual target before stabilizing the limb with either a low or a higher level of elbow flexor/extensor coactivity (CoA), which was cued by target diameter. Cursor diameter provided real-time biofeedback of actual muscle CoA. In reversing, the limb was to reverse direction within the target and return to the origin with minimal CoA. We previously reported that subjects overshoot the goal when attempting a reversal after first having learned to reach accurately to the same target. Here we test the hypothesis that this hypermetric results because reversals co-opt the initial feedforward control action from the preceding trained reach, thereby failing to account for task-dependent changes in limb impedance induced by differences in flexor/extensor coactivity as the target is acquired (higher in reaching than reversing). Instructed increases in elbow CoA began mid-reach, thus increasing elbow impedance and reducing transient oscillations present in low CoA movements. Flexor EMG alone increased at movement onset. Test reversals incorporated the initial agonist activity of previous reaches but not the increased coactivity at the target, thus leading to overshoot. Moreover, we observed elevated coactivity in reversals upon returning to the origin even though coactivity in reaching was centered at the goal target. These findings refute the idea that the brain necessarily invokes distinct unitary control actions for reaches and reversals made to the same target. Instead, reaches and reversals share a common control action that initiates trajectories toward their target and another later control action that terminates movement and stabilizes the limb about its final resting posture, which differs in the two tasks.
Recommended Citation
Scheidt, Robert A.; Ghez, Claude; and Asnani, Supriya, "Patterns of Hypermetria and Terminal Cocontraction during Point-to-point Movements Demonstrate Independent Action of Trajectory and Postural Controllers" (2011). Biomedical Engineering Faculty Research and Publications. 182.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/182
ADA Accessible Version
Comments
Accepted version. Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 106, No. 5 (November 1, 2011): 2368-2382. DOI. © American Physiological Society. Used with permission.