Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Publication Date
8-2010
Publisher
Elsevier
Source Publication
Biophysical Journal
Source ISSN
0006-3495
Original Item ID
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.069
Abstract
ADP influx and ADP phosphorylation may alter mitochondrial free [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]m) and consequently mitochondrial bioenergetics by several postulated mechanisms. We tested how [Ca2+]m is affected by H2PO4− (Pi), Mg2+, calcium uniporter activity, matrix volume changes, and the bioenergetic state. We measured [Ca2+]m, membrane potential, redox state, matrix volume, pHm, and O2 consumption in guinea pig heart mitochondria with or without ruthenium red, carboxyatractyloside, or oligomycin, and at several levels of Mg2+ and Pi. Energized mitochondria showed a dose-dependent increase in [Ca2+]m after adding CaCl2 equivalent to 20, 114, and 485 nM extramatrix free [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]e); this uptake was attenuated at higher buffer Mg2+. Adding ADP transiently increased [Ca2+]m up to twofold. The ADP effect on increasing [Ca2+]m could be partially attributed to matrix contraction, but was little affected by ruthenium red or changes in Mg2+ or Pi. Oligomycin largely reduced the increase in [Ca2+]m by ADP compared to control, and [Ca2+]m did not return to baseline. Carboxyatractyloside prevented the ADP-induced [Ca2+]m increase. Adding CaCl2 had no effect on bioenergetics, except for a small increase in state 2 and state 4 respiration at 485 nM [Ca2+]e. These data suggest that matrix ADP influx and subsequent phosphorylation increase [Ca2+]m largely due to the interaction of matrix Ca2+ with ATP, ADP, Pi, and cation buffering proteins in the matrix.
Recommended Citation
Haumann, Johan; Dash, Ranjan K.; Stowe, David F.; Boelens, Age D.; Beard, Daniel A.; and Camara, Amadou K.S., "Mitochondrial Free [Ca2+] Increases during ATP/ADP Antiport and ADP Phosphorylation: Exploration of Mechanisms" (2010). Biomedical Engineering Faculty Research and Publications. 273.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/bioengin_fac/273
Comments
Published version. Biophysical Journal, Vol. 99, No. 4 (August 2010): 997-1006. DOI. © 2010 Elsevier (Cell Press). Used with permission.