Date of Award
Fall 2024
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department
Psychology
First Advisor
Alyson Gerdes
Second Advisor
Debra L. Oswald
Third Advisor
Ed de St. Aubin
Abstract
This dissertation consists of one correlational and one experimental study grounded in Social Identity Theory, which posits that individuals derive a significant portion of their self- concept from their membership in social groups (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). One’s social identity plays a crucial role in how individuals interpret intergroup relations. Building on this understanding, I explored factors that may explain the denial of institutional racism among White individuals, focusing on the importance of their racial identity, attitudes towards White privilege, and the perception of social threat. In Study 1, which included 193 White participants, a weak positive correlation was found between racial identity centrality and denial of institutional racism; however, this relationship was not mediated by attitudes toward White privilege. In Study 2, which involved 203 White participants, individuals were exposed to a collective group threat through an article about changing racial demographics in the U.S., while the control group read a similar article about the changing demographics of dating app users. Results showed that collective group threat did not significantly affect racial identity, belief in White privilege, or denial of institutional racism. These findings suggest that while racial identity centrality may influence beliefs about institutional racism, other social identities and factors likely play critical roles in shaping White individuals' beliefs. Additionally, social identity threats related to resources or national culture may not impact the denial of institutional racism; however, other social identity threats not evaluated in this study may be more relevant and impactful in this context. This research underscores the complexity of attitudes White Americans hold toward institutional racism and indicates directions for future studies to better understand and address its denial.