Document Type
Article
Language
Eng
Publication Date
11-2016
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE)
Source Publication
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Source ISSN
0093-9994
Abstract
This paper uses formal mathematical optimization techniques based on parametric finite-element-based computationally efficient models and differential evolution algorithms. For constant-power applications, in the novel approach described, three concurrent objective functions are minimized: material cost, losses, in order to ensure high efficiency, and the difference between the rated and the characteristic current, aiming to achieve very high constant-power flux-weakening range. Only the first two objectives are considered for constant-torque applications. Two types of interior permanent magnet rotors in a single- and double-layer V-shaped configuration are considered, respectively. The stator has the typical two slots per pole and phase distributed winding configuration. The results for the constant-torque design show that, in line with expectations, high efficiency and high power factor machines are more costly, and that the low-cost machines have poorer efficiency and power factor and most importantly, and despite a common misconception, the saliency ratio may also be lower in this case. For constant-power designs, the saliency ratio can be beneficial. Nevertheless, despite a common misconception, when cost is considered alongside performance as an objective, a higher saliency ratio does not necessarily improve the power factors of motors suitable for ideal infinite flux weakening.
Recommended Citation
Zhang, Peng; Ionel, Dan M.; and Demerdash, Nabeel, "Saliency Ratio and Power Factor of IPM Motors Optimally Designed for High Efficiency and Low Cost Objectives" (2016). Electrical and Computer Engineering Faculty Research and Publications. 298.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/electric_fac/298
ADA Accessible Version
Comments
Accepted version. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 52, No. 6 (November/December 2016): 4730-4739. DOI. © 2016 Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). Used with permission.