"Not Every Co-existential Map is Confluent" by Paul Bankston
 

Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

10 p.

Publication Date

2010

Publisher

University of Houston

Source Publication

Houston Journal of Mathematics

Source ISSN

0362-1588

Abstract

A continuous surjection between compacta is co-existential if it is the second of two maps whose composition is a standard ultracopower projection. Co-existential maps are always weakly confluent, and are even monotone when the range space is locally connected; so it is a natural question to ask whether they are always confluent. Here we give a negative answer. This is an interesting question, mainly because of the fact that most theorems about confluent maps have parallel versions for co-existential maps---notably, both kinds of maps preserve hereditary indecomposability. Where the known parallels break down is in the question of chainability. It is a celebrated open problem whether confluent maps preserve chainability, or even being a pseudo-arc; however, as has recently been shown, co-existential maps do indeed preserve both these properties.

Comments

Published version. Houston Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 36, No. 4 (2010): 1231-1242. Publisher Link. © 2010 University of Houston. Used with permission.

Share

COinS