Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

17 p.

Publication Date

6-2010

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Source Publication

Pedagogies: An International Journal

Source ISSN

1554-4818

Original Item ID

doi: 10.1080/1554480X.2010.485724

Abstract

This paper discusses the approaches to teaching linear equation solving that are embedded in a Standards-based mathematics curriculum (Connected Mathematics Program or CMP) and in a traditional mathematics curriculum (Glencoe Mathematics) in the United States. Overall, the CMP curriculum takes a functional approach to teaching equation solving, while Glencoe Mathematics takes a structural approach. The functional approach emphasizes the important ideas of change and variation in situations and contexts. It also emphasizes the representation of relationships between variables. The structural approach, on the other hand, requires students to work abstractly with symbols and follow procedures in a systematic way. The CMP curriculum may be regarded as a curriculum with a pedagogy that emphasizes predominantly the conceptual aspects of equation solving, while Glencoe Mathematics may be regarded as a curriculum with a pedagogy that emphasizes predominantly the procedural aspects of equation solving. The two curricula may serve as concrete examples of functional and structural approaches, respectively, to the teaching of algebra in general and equation solving in particular.

Comments

Accepted version. Pedagogies: An International Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3 (2010): 170-186. DOI. © Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Used with permission.

moyer_1337acc.docx (499 kB)
ADA Accessible Version

Share

COinS