Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

7 p.

Publication Date

7-2013

Publisher

Elsevier

Source Publication

Contraception

Source ISSN

0010-7824

Original Item ID

doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.010

Abstract

Background

The aim was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of two Internet-supported fertility-awareness-based methods of family planning.

Study design

Six hundred and sixty-seven women and their male partners were randomized into either an electronic hormonal fertility monitor (EHFM) group or a cervical mucus monitoring (CMM) group. Both groups utilized a Web site with instructions, charts and support. Acceptability was assessed online at 1, 3 and 6 months. Pregnancy rates were determined by survival analysis.

Results

The EHFM participants (N= 197) had a total pregnancy rate of 7 per 100 users over 12 months of use compared with 18.5 for the CMM group (N= 164). The log rank survival test showed a significant difference (p

Conclusion

In comparison with the CMM, the EHFM method of family planning was more effective. All users had an increase in acceptability over time. Results are tempered by the high dropout rate.

Comments

Accepted version. Contraception, Vol. 88, No. 1 (July 2013): 24-30. DOI. © 2013 Elsevier. Used with permission.

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Contraception. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Randomized Comparison of Two Internet-Supported Fertility Awareness Based Methods of Family Planning, VOL 88, ISSUE 1, July 2013. DOI.

Download

Included in

Nursing Commons

Share

COinS