Document Type

Article

Language

eng

Format of Original

19 p.

Publication Date

2009

Publisher

Philosophy Documentation Center

Source Publication

Journal of Philosophical Research

Source ISSN

1053-8364

Original Item ID

doi: 10.5840/jpr_2009_11

Abstract

In Book VI of his Confessions, Saint Augustine offers a detailed description of one of the most famous cases of weakness of will in the history of philosophy. Augustine characterizes his experience as a monstrous situation in which he both wills and does not will moral growth, but he is at odds to explain this phenomenon. In this paper, I argue that Aquinas’s action theory offers important resources for explaining Augustine’s monstrosity. On Aquinas’s schema, human acts are composed of various operations of intellect and will, and thus are subject to disintegration. In order to capture the gap in human action between making choices to pursue particular goals and translating those choices into behavior, Aquinas distinguishes between two operations of will that he calls choice and use. I apply hisdistinction between choice and use to Augustine’s case, arguing that Augustine’s moral weakness is a result of will’s failure to use its choices. The central thesis of this paper is that Augustine’s monstrosity is a bona fide case of weakness of will that is best explained as a failure in use at the level of will.

Comments

Accepted version. Journal of Philosophical Research, Vol. 34 (2009): 345-363. DOI. © 2009 Philosophy Documentation Center. Used with permission.

Download

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS