Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Publication Date
Fall 2014
Publisher
Verlag Karl Alber
Source Publication
Schelling-Studien
Source ISSN
2196-4521
Abstract
I consider the identity-theory of the Würzburg System as part of Schelling's five-year project to provide a metaphysical foundation for Naturphilosophie that is free of Kantian/Fichtean subjectivism and obeys the key constraint formulated by the German appropriation of Spinoza's: there can be no "egress from the absolute," i.e., no deduction of the limitations of finitude such as the Wissenschaftslehre provided. The demands of epistemic security (the identity of that which knows and what is known) and ontological simplicity (the impossibility of ontological commitment both to an absolute and to individuals) are met by reworking the theory of the absolute's 'cognition' so that God's self-affirmation and self-contemplation are identified with the philosopher's intellectual intuition. In this way, Schelling integrates contents that Spinoza left separate in the first three books of the Ethics and establishes an ontology of power; this grounds a more dynamic version of Naturphilosophie, where Potenzen themselves become ontological actors.
Recommended Citation
Vater, Michael, "Reconfiguring Identity in Schelling’s Würzburg System" (2014). Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications. 747.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/phil_fac/747
Comments
Published version. Schelling-Studien, Vol. 2 (Autumn 2014): 127-144. Publisher link. © 2014 Verlag Karl Alber. Used with permission.