"Variation in Outcomes and Number of Visits Following Care Guideline Im" by Jacob J. Capin, Kate I. Minick et al.
 

Variation in Outcomes and Number of Visits Following Care Guideline Implementation: Part 2 of an Analysis of 12,355 Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-2023

Publisher

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

Source Publication

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Source ISSN

0190-6011

Original Item ID

DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11370

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the variation in outcomes and number of visits before and after implementing a care guideline for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation.

DESIGN: Nonrandomized intervention study.

METHODS: We compared 2558 patients with TKA who received care that was not standardized (non-care guideline [NCG] group) to 9797 patients with TKA who received care according to the care guideline (CG). We fit 2 Bayesian hierarchical linear regression models using the Knee Outcome Survey – Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADL) change score and number of physical therapy (PT) visits as the response variables, controlling for relevant predictor variables. We also compared the ratio of the standard deviations of the KOS-ADL change scores and the number of PT visits within and between clinics.

RESULTS: The overall estimated mean improvement in KOS-ADL change score was 23.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3, 25.7) in the NCG group and 28.7 points (95% CI: 27.5, 29.7) in the CG group; the mean difference was 5.6 (2.7–8.6). Mean KOS-ADL change scores were higher in the CG group than the NCG group in every clinic, although only 8 clinics improved significantly. The number of PT visits did not change meaningfully (NCG: mean, 10.7 [95% CI: 9.9, 11.5]; CG: mean, 10.5 [95% CI: 9.9, 10.9]). Variation in KOS-ADL change score decreased by 4% within clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.93, 0.99]) and 63% between clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.37 [95% CI: 0.21, 0.62]). Variation in number of visits decreased by 7% within clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.96]) and 19% between clinics (CG-NCG ratio: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.39, 1.49]).

CONCLUSION: Implementing a care guideline for TKA rehabilitation may improve outcomes and reduce unwarranted variation in practice within clinics and especially between clinics within a large health care system.

Comments

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, Vol. 53, No. 3 (March 2023): 107-158. DOI.

Share

COinS