Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Publication Date
12-6-2006
Publisher
Elsevier
Source Publication
Brain Research
Source ISSN
0006-8993
Original Item ID
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.129
Abstract
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is known to subserve working memory (WM) processes. Brain imaging studies of WM using delayed response tasks (DRTs) have shown memory-load-dependent activation increases in dorsal prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions. These activation increases are believed to reflect manipulation of to-be-remembered information in the service of memory-consolidation. This speculation has been based on observations of similar activation increases in tasks that overtly require manipulation by instructing participants to reorder to-be-remembered list items. In this study, we tested the assumption of functional equivalence between these two types of WM tasks. Participants performed a DRT under two conditions with memory loads ranging from 3 to 6 letters. In an “item-order” condition, participants were required to remember letters in the order in which they were presented. In a “reordering” condition, participants were required to remember the letters in alphabetical order. Load-related activation increases were observed during the encoding and maintenance periods of the order maintenance condition, whereas load-related activation decreases were observed in the same periods of the reordering condition. These results suggest that (1) the neural substrates associated with long-list retention and those associated with reordering are not equivalent, (2) cognitive processes associated with long-list retention may be more closely approximated by item-order maintenance than by reordering, and (3) multiple forms of WM manipulation are dissociable on the basis of fMRI data.
Recommended Citation
Eldreth, Dana A.; Patterson, Michael D.; Porcelli, Anthony J.; Biswal, Bharat B.; Rebbechi, Donovan; and Rypma, Bart, "Evidence for Multiple Manipulation Processes in Prefrontal Cortex" (2006). Psychology Faculty Research and Publications. 86.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/psych_fac/86
Comments
Accepted version. Brain Research, Vol. 1123, No.1 (December 6 2006): 145-156. DOI. © 2006 Elsevier. Used with permission.