"Edge-Chipping and Translucency Comparison Among Lithium Silicate-Based" by Essa Abdullah Alghamdi

Date of Award

Spring 2022

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Dentistry

First Advisor

Berzins, David

Second Advisor

Toth, Jeffrey

Third Advisor

Thompson, Geoffrey

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the edge-chipping toughness and the translucency of lithium silicate-based glass ceramics. Materials and Methods: Four lithium silicate/disilicate glass-ceramic materials, IPS e.max CAD and GC Initial LiSi blocks, and two zirconia-lithium silicate glass-ceramic materials, Vita Suprinity and Celtra Duo, were prepared and tested (n=20 specimens/group). Specimens (14 x 12 x 1.5 mm) were sectioned from commercially available chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) blocks, fired (if indicated), ground, and polished. Translucency was assessed via a spectrophotometer for each group. For edge chipping, specimens were adhered to a resin bed created in a customized steel specimen holder. A universal testing machine was utilized with a 120-degree sharp conical indenter, and the specimen's edge was positioned at distances ranging from 0.1 mm to 1 mm horizontally from the indenter tip. Translucency was compared with 1-way ANOVA and the edge toughness was evaluated with ANCOVA. Results: Significant differences in translucency parameter (TP) were found between the materials (p< .001). The statistical ranking of the TP was: GC Initial LiSi-HT>IPS e.max CAD-HT>Celtra Duo>IPS e.max CAD-MT=GC Initial LiSi-LT>Vita Suprinity. For the edge toughness (Te). The materials ranked was IPS e.max CAD HT> IPS e.max CAD MT>GC Initial LiSi HT>GC Initial LiSi LT>Vita Suprinity>Celtra Duo. The edge toughness Te in (N/mm) were 358.7, 281.7, 224.0, 220.7, 203.2, 192.1, respectively. Conclusion: The incorporation of tetragonal zirconia in zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics did not result in superior edge toughness. Moreover, Vita Suprinity was more opaque than other tested ceramics.

Included in

Dentistry Commons

COinS