Document Type
Article
Language
eng
Publication Date
10-2017
Publisher
Wiley
Source Publication
Ecology and Evolution
Source ISSN
2045-7758
Abstract
The effects of lightning on trees range from catastrophic death to the absence of observable damage. Such differences may be predictable among tree species, and more generally among plant life history strategies and growth forms. We used field‐collected electrical resistivity data in temperate and tropical forests to model how the distribution of power from a lightning discharge varies with tree size and identity, and with the presence of lianas. Estimated heating density (heat generated per volume of tree tissue) and maximum power (maximum rate of heating) from a standardized lightning discharge differed 300% among tree species. Tree size and morphology also were important; the heating density of a hypothetical 10 m tall Alseis blackiana was 49 times greater than for a 30 m tall conspecific, and 127 times greater than for a 30 m tall Dipteryx panamensis. Lianas may protect trees from lightning by conducting electric current; estimated heating and maximum power were reduced by 60% (±7.1%) for trees with one liana and by 87% (±4.0%) for trees with three lianas. This study provides the first quantitative mechanism describing how differences among trees can influence lightning–tree interactions, and how lianas can serve as natural lightning rods for trees.
Recommended Citation
Gora, Evan M.; Bitzer, Phillip M.; Burchfield, Jeffrey C.; Schnitzer, Stefan A.; and Yanoviak, Stephen P., "Effects of Lightning on Trees: A Predictive Model Based on in situ Electrical Resistivity" (2017). Biological Sciences Faculty Research and Publications. 643.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/bio_fac/643
Comments
Published version. Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 7, No. 20 (October 2017): 8523-8534. DOI. © 2017 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.